J. Timmons Roberts
Designing a new course in Environmental Sociology in 1994, I threw out
my old methods of teaching by lecture with the goal of "covering
material." Rather, in this sophomore-level course with high enrollments
of non-Sociology majors (including many biologists and engineers), my
goal is to structure and guide experiences wherein students become
aware of the complexities and deeply social roots of environmental
conflicts. I use a small-group participatory approach to teaching the
course, wherein students role-play as members of opposing groups in
environmental conflicts. I began the course with a simulation which
attempts to put students immediately in the position of a group facing
a serious hazard in their environment (that their classroom building
was contaminated). I sprinkled seven debates/simulations throughout the
semester, on issues such as toxic exposures in neighborhoods, in the
workplace, global environmental change, the Amazon struggle, and the
potential for sustainability in capitalism. As the semester progresses
the students become aware of the need for sociological and political
economy perspectives on environmental issues.
From the first day of class, students are recruited immediately into
small groups to develop position statements on environmental conflicts.
They must solve problems of disagreement and differing levels of
commitment by various group members. With pedagogical innovations come
questions about how to grade fairly. To reduce student anxieties, I
attempt to spread around the students' grades over more assignments and
group products. About a quarter of their grade depends on their group's
statements to the class. They also must write discussion papers on the
readings every third week, and post their discussion questions to our
class's email "listserver" (40 percent of their grade). Because of
these assignments and group projects throughout the semester, I also
found myself eliminating multiple-choice portions of the examinations
and keeping only the broad essays (25 percent). Finally, in Spring 1996
as a class project we conducted a scientific random phone survey of the
Greater New Orleans area on environmental perceptions, concerns and
behaviors. We went public with the findings in a press conference
covered by two television channels. Students were then given part of
their class participation grade (10 percent) based on how many of the
ten required surveys they actually conducted, and on their additional
efforts to help with the data entry and analysis.
The course has been extremely well received by majors and non-majors
alike. It also has become an important part of our university's
Environmental Studies program. As more students take the class,
however, there has also grown more demand for a junior/senior level
course. My goal therefore is to someday teach a course entitled
"Nature, Technology and Society."
I hope others will post their syllabi to CNS and that more
interdisciplinary approaches combining political economy, ecology and
sociology can be developed.
2-line description of myself:
J. Timmons Roberts is Assistant Professor of Sociology and Latin
American Studies at Tulane University. His teaching and research link
social and environmental impacts of global economic restructuring. He
co-edits email discussion lists the Environment in Latin America
Network and ENVTECSOC, the discussion list of the Environment,
Technology and Society section of the American Sociological Association.
Your requirements are preparation, attendance,
participation in discussions, debates, hearings, and our survey, 4
short discussion papers, and two exams. Participation in our on-line
discussion is purely optional but will be interesting. Attendance:
missing classes will make it difficult to keep up and to participate in
crucial class exercises. Being a reading course, to understand what
we're talking about and to participate, YOU MUST KEEP UP WITH THE
READINGS AND COME PREPARED TO OUR MEETINGS.
On the Discussion Papers: The class will be divided into three
groups which will alternate weeks preparing short papers on the
reading. These type-written, single-spaced papers are due by 8:30 a.m.
on the morning of our Tuesday class. One copy should be handed in to
the instructor's mailbox (220 Newcomb), and please circulate the
questions to our class electronic discussion list. Be sure to keep one
copy. These discussion papers should include 3 parts: 1. a very brief
(concise) summary of the central points or arguments the author(s)
present(s) [2-4 paragraphs]. 2. a brief assessment of the strengths and
weaknesses of the authors' central argument [2-4 paragraphs]. Without
being authorities, comment here on whether the author's evidence really
supports what they set out to do and their conclusions. How does their
viewpoint color the interpretations they make? Say why you agree or
disagree with their project and conclusions. and 3. Provide two
discussion questions related to the readings. One should be a lingering
question for you, and the other a question that will promote class
discussion. I will use these questions in class, so make them as juicy
as you can.
I will calculate final grades roughly as follows: five discussion
papers (40%), debate/hearings participation and summary statements
(25%), mid-term and final take-home exam (25%) and class participation
(10%), which includes participation in the survey and evidence that
you're keeping up with the readings. Pop quizzes are possible if it
appears that anyone is not keeping up with the reading. I hope that we
can build an exciting, fun and open forum here for all to participate.
That means everyone helping by allowing others to talk, not dominating
the discussions, and encouraging differences of opinion. I do not
expect you to agree with me: I hope you'll stand up for what you think
(I will not penalize you). Also, don't worry about asking what you
might consider a naive or "stupid" question--others are probably also
wondering the same thing. Because the class comes from diverse
backgrounds and trainings, we need be aware that some will need basic
background information to bring them into the group. Stay tuned-in:
some of these basic reviews will contain information you thought you
knew...but didn't. I expect students to learn each other's names, and
treat each other with respect.
| Date | Papers Due: | Readings Due: |
| Week 1: Introduction to the Course: The Newcomb Hall Scandal | ||
| Jan 11 | none, but start other readings as soon as possible. | |
| Week 2: Responding to the News that Your Community, School or Workplace is Contaminated | ||
| Jan 16 | [Group A] | Tuesday: Edelstein Chapters 1 and 2; |
| Jan 18 | Thurs: A Senate-type Hearing on a Hazardous Site, between: Students, Environmentalists, Residents and Local Government Officials (see handout [Group C are the Senators: who hear arguments, raise questions and vote]. | |
| Reading: Edelstein Chapter 3 | ||
| Week 3: Understanding Different Levels of How People Respond: Cognitive Adjustment, Individual and Family Impacts, Government Reaction, Community Response | ||
| Jan 23 | [Group B] | Tues: Edelstein Chapters 4 and 5 |
| Jan 25 | Thurs: In class: begin designing survey; Reading: Edelstein Chapters 6,7 and 8 | |
| Week 4: Sociology of the Environmental Movement in the U.S. | ||
| Jan 30 | [Group C] | Tuesday: Short Videos: Discourse of National and Local Environmental Groups |
| Readings: Dunlap and Mertig Preface and Chapter 1: "The Evolution of the U.S. Environmental Movement from 1970 to 1990: An Overview." Mitchell, Mertig and Dunlap:"Twenty Years of Environmental Mobilization: Trends Among national Environmental Organizations." (Dunlap and Mertig; Chapter 2) (Handout on Funding Pleas Simulation) | ||
| Feb 1 | Thursday: Guest speaker: Darrel Malek-Wiley, Sierra Club, Louisiana | |
| Michael McCloskey: "Twenty Years of Change in the Environmental Movement: An Insider's View." (Dunlap and Mertig: Chapter 7); Helvarg book Intro, Chap. 1 | ||
| Week 5: NIMBYS, Grassroots, and Radical Environmentalism, Environmental Racism and the Environmental Justice Movements | ||
| Feb 6 | [Group A] | Funding Pleas Simulation: Environmental Groups Present their Group's mission, niche, and what they'd do with the money. [Group A Funders]. Readings: Nicholas Freudenberg and Carol Steinsapir "Not in Our Backyards: The Grassroots Environmental Movement" (Dunlap and Mertig Chapter 3); Bullard and Wright: "The Quest for Environmental Equity: Mobilizing the African-American Community for Social Change." (Dunlap and Mertig Chapter 4); Dunlap and Mertig Chapter 5: Devall "Deep Ecology and Radical Environmentalism." |
| Feb 8 | Guest Speaker: Tom Bryant, Gulf Coast Tenants Association; or Beverly Wright; Reading: | |
| Reading: UCS briefing paper: U.S. Consumption and the Environment | ||
| Week 6: How Do You Measure Public Support for Environmental Concerns? | ||
| Feb 13 | [no papers] | Riley E. Dunlap: "Trends in Public Opinion Toward Environmental Issues: 1965-1990." (Dunlap and Mertig Chapter 8) /in class work on survey\ |
| Feb 15 | Mid-term Exam (readings and lectures and videos up to this point) | |
| Week 7: Deep Ecology and Eco-Feminism | ||
| Feb. 20th: Mardi Gras: | No class. Enjoy. Begin Foster and Helvarg books over break. | |
| Feb 22 | Religion/Philosophy and Environmentalism lecture; /survey completed in class\ | |
| Week 8: Rewinding the Tape Part I: Is There a Mess, and If So, How Did We Get Into It? | ||
| Feb 27 | [Group B] | Tuesday: Foster book, chapters 1,2; UCS briefing papers on Global Change |
| Feb 29 | Thursday: In-class simulation of bargaining between states for the siting of a Japanese film and plastics company. | |
| Foster book, chapters 3,4 (Handout for Sustainability debate, groups assigned) | ||
| /Surveys distributed to class for completion by phone\ | ||
| Week 9: Rewinding Part II: The Expanding Economic System and the Environment | ||
| Mar 5 | [Group C] | Tuesday: Foster book, chapters 5,6 |
| Mar 7 | Thursday: A hearing/debate on Economic Growth and Environmental Abuse: Can capitalism be Reshaped to Meet the Needs of Sustainability? [Group B are Senators] Reading: Foster book, chapters 7,8; UCS reading | |
| /First 5 Completed Surveys Due\ | ||
| Week 10: A Case Study: Social and Environmental Crises and Struggles in the Brazilian Amazon | ||
| Mar 12 | [All Groups] | Tuesday: Fight for the Forest Chapters 1,2,3,4; Background on Amazon talk |
| Mar 14 | Identifying all the players (handout on Amazon simulations) | |
| Readings: Fight for the Forest Chapters 5, 6, epilogue | ||
| /All Completed Surveys Due\ | ||
| Week 11: A Way Out of the Amazon and Developing World Mess? | ||
| Mar 19 | [Group A] | Dunlap and Mertig Chapter 6: Caldwell: "Globalizing Environmentalism: Threshold of a New Phase in International Relations." UCS papers on Poverty/Women and Development |
| Mar 21 | Thursday: Simulation Debate: stakeholder groups in the Amazon conflict. [Group C senators] | |
| /survey data entry completed\ | ||
| Week 12: The Social Struggle over Occupational Risks: How do People Perceive Workplace Dangers and Why? What Can Workers Do? | ||
| Mar 26 | [Group B] | Tuesday: Fox book: Toxic Work, Intro, Chapters 1,2 |
| Mar 28 | Thursday: Toxic Work Ch. 3,4 (Workplace debate handout) | |
| /survey data analysis completed\ | ||
| April 2, 4: Spring Break, enjoy. | ||
| Week 13: Race and Class Inequality and Exposures on the Job; The "Right to Know," Stress and Exposures | ||
| Apr 9 | [GroupC] | Tuesday: Toxic Work Ch. 5,6 |
| Apr 11 | Thursday: Hearing/Debate on Workplace Exposures [Group A Senators]; Toxic Work Ch. 7,8, Conclusion | |
| /survey data reported back to class\ | ||
| Week 14: Anti-Environmental Backlash Groups and Movements in the 1990s | ||
| Apr 16 | [all groups] | Tuesday: Helvarg book Chap. 2-8 (final debate handout) |
| Apr 18 | Thursday: Helvarg book Chaps. 9-14 /PRESS CONFERENCE ON SURVEY\ | |
| Week 15: Final Class: Can America and the World Economy Be Made Sustainable? | ||
| Apr 23 | Last Class: Final Debate on How Society could be made sustainable; evaluations, Final Debate [all groups participate]: What would have to change for society to be sustainable? Could it? (Take-Home Exam Questions Distributed) | |
| Wed. May 1 (10 am): | One-hour in-class exam. Your take-home tests are DUE at the end of the exam period. Congratulations on finishing the course. Have a sweet summer. | |